An 85-95.2 GHz transformer-based injection-locked frequency tripler in 65nm CMOS

Zhirning Chen*, Payam Heydari

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A W-band transformer-based injection-locked frequency tripler (T-ILFT) is designed and implemented in 65nm standard CMOS technology using a O.8V supply voltage. The use of injection locking topology with on-chip transformer provides several advantages over conventional design. Occupying an chip area of O.089mm2 (including buffers), the T-ILFT achieves an input sensitivity of -15dBm and a continuous locking range from 85 to 95.2GHz with 4dBm input power. T he measured phase noise degradation from that of the input signal source is only 9.8dB at IMHz offset. T he harmonic suppressions for the first and second harmonics are measured to be 32.9dB and 38.5dB, respectively. T he power consumption is only 5.2mW for T-ILFT and 14.6mW for output buffers. To the authors' best knowledge, this T-ILFT achieves the highest operation frequency for injection-locked-based frequency multipliers, reported to date.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2010 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, MTT 2010
Pages776-779
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes
Event2010 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, MTT 2010 - Anaheim, CA, United States
Duration: 23 May 201028 May 2010

Publication series

NameIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest
ISSN (Print)0149-645X

Conference

Conference2010 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, MTT 2010
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityAnaheim, CA
Period23/05/1028/05/10

Keywords

  • CMOS
  • Frequency generation
  • Frequency tripler
  • Injection-locked
  • Millimeter wave
  • Transformer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An 85-95.2 GHz transformer-based injection-locked frequency tripler in 65nm CMOS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this