TY - JOUR
T1 - Air pollution governance in China and India
T2 - Comparison and implications
AU - Wang, Pu
AU - Liu, Dachuan
AU - Mukherjee, Arideep
AU - Agrawal, Madhoolika
AU - Zhang, Huawei
AU - Agathokleous, Evgenios
AU - Qiao, Xue
AU - Xu, Xiaobin
AU - Chen, Yan
AU - Wu, Tong
AU - Zhu, Mengye
AU - Saikawa, Eri
AU - Agrawal, Shashi Bhushan
AU - Feng, Zhaozhong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Severe air pollution in China and India threatens the health of over one-third of the global population. When it comes to air pollution governance, the two countries have vastly different approaches. China's approach features centralized target-setting and implementation, with policies enforced primarily through top-down administrative lines. While India's approach reflects the division of power among central and state governments and relies substantially on legislative and judiciary systems for accountability. We conduct a detailed review of the trends and sources of six air pollutants in China and India, and make a structured comparison of China and India's air pollution policy frameworks. An extensive literature review is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of policies in each country. The studies show that China's policy efforts have achieved significant improvements in air quality, while India's policies have been largely ineffective. Nevertheless, both approaches have the potential to lead to effective air pollution governance, if a country can build strong political will and clearly defined accountability systems. We further identify key lessons learned from the two countries for air pollution policymaking in developing countries, including taking good advantage of “post-crisis policy window”, and targeting “low-hanging fruits” to make incremental improvements in a cost-effective way.
AB - Severe air pollution in China and India threatens the health of over one-third of the global population. When it comes to air pollution governance, the two countries have vastly different approaches. China's approach features centralized target-setting and implementation, with policies enforced primarily through top-down administrative lines. While India's approach reflects the division of power among central and state governments and relies substantially on legislative and judiciary systems for accountability. We conduct a detailed review of the trends and sources of six air pollutants in China and India, and make a structured comparison of China and India's air pollution policy frameworks. An extensive literature review is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of policies in each country. The studies show that China's policy efforts have achieved significant improvements in air quality, while India's policies have been largely ineffective. Nevertheless, both approaches have the potential to lead to effective air pollution governance, if a country can build strong political will and clearly defined accountability systems. We further identify key lessons learned from the two countries for air pollution policymaking in developing countries, including taking good advantage of “post-crisis policy window”, and targeting “low-hanging fruits” to make incremental improvements in a cost-effective way.
KW - Air pollution policy
KW - Asia
KW - Governance
KW - Particulate matter
KW - Public health
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85148321212
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.006
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.006
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85148321212
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 142
SP - 112
EP - 120
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
ER -