Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Advancing automated phase recognition in cataract surgery through the SICS-155 challenge

  • Simon Mueller
  • , Bhuvan Sachdeva
  • , Singri Niharika Prasad
  • , Raphael Lechtenboehmer
  • , Frank G. Holz
  • , Robert P. Finger
  • , Christopher Nielsen
  • , Patrick Gooi
  • , Adrian Gooi
  • , Nils D. Forkert
  • , Yasser El Jarida
  • , Youssef Iraqi
  • , Loubna Mekouar
  • , Yiran Kong
  • , Zhihai Huang
  • , Jiawei Du
  • , Huiqi Li
  • , Lasse Renz-Kiefel
  • , Eric L. Wisotzky
  • , Dong Zheng
  • Jiacheng Lin, Miao Hu, Yanwu Xu, Mohit Jain, Kaushik Murali, Maximilian W.M. Wintergerst*, Thomas Schultz
*Corresponding author for this work
  • B-IT and Department of Computer Science
  • University of Bonn
  • Department of Ophthalmology
  • Microsoft USA
  • Sankara Eye Hospital, Bengaluru
  • Department of Ophthalmology
  • Heidelberg University 
  • University of Calgary
  • Biomedical Engineering Program
  • Department of Ophthalmology
  • University of Manitoba
  • Department of Otolaryngology
  • University of British Columbia
  • School of Medicine
  • Simon Fraser University
  • Department of Radiology
  • College of Computing
  • Mohammed VI Polytechnic University
  • Beijing Institute of Technology
  • Computer Vision and Graphics
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde
  • University of Rostock
  • Visual Computing
  • Humboldt University of Berlin
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University
  • South China University of Technology
  • Augenzentrum Grischun
  • Chur
  • Lamarr Institute for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

Abstract

Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) is a prevalent technique in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Automated analysis of SICS videos based on artificial intelligence (AI) would benefit self-evaluation, training, monitoring, and ultimately facilitate computer aided surgical assistance. However, this procedure remains understudied in terms of automated surgical analysis due to a lack of publicly available data. To advance this field, we organized the SICS-155 phase recognition challenge at MICCAI 2025. It was based on a dataset with 155 videos recorded at Sankara Eye Hospital in Bengaluru, India with an average duration of 13:05 minutes, annotated with 19 distinct surgical phases. In this work, we first present the results and findings of that challenge in accordance with the BIAS guidelines. Second, we integrated key technical innovations from the participating teams to develop a new, state-of-the-art approach for phase recognition in a post-operative, offline setting. This approach uses a boundary-aware FACT architecture, which we evaluated using videos of both SICS and phacoemulsification. Our approach achieved an accuracy of 87.98% [95%-CI: ±2.06], an edit score of 90.80% [95%-CI: ±1.47], and a segmental F1-score of 89.56% [95%-CI: ±1.92] on the SICS-155 challenge dataset, as well as an accuracy of 97.61%/ 93.36%, a precision of 98.42%/ 95.27%, and a recall of 97.97%/ 93.32% on the Cataract-101 phacoemulsification public dataset (depending on the data split). Building on these promising results, our future work will investigate potential real-time quality assessment and complication recognition in SICS and facilitate the development of clinical training and surgical quality monitoring software for ophthalmologists in LMICs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104313
JournalMedical Image Analysis
Volume115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2027
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Manual small-incision cataract surgery
  • Phacoemulsification
  • Phase recognition, Video dataset
  • Temporal action segmentation
  • Vision transformers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advancing automated phase recognition in cataract surgery through the SICS-155 challenge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this