A way to identify whether a DFT gap is from right reasons or error cancellations: The case of copper chalcogenides

Jiale Shen, Haitao Liu, Yuanchang Li*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Gap opening remains elusive in copper chalcogenides (Cu2X, X = S, Se, and Te), not least because Hubbard + U, hybrid functional, and GW methods have also failed. In this work, we elucidate that their failure originates from a severe underestimation of the 4s-3d orbital splitting of the Cu atom, which leads to a band-order inversion in the presence of an anionic crystal field. As a result, the Fermi energy is pinned due to symmetry, yielding an invariant zero gap. Utilizing the hybrid pseudopotentials to correct the underestimation on the atomic side opens up gaps of experimental magnitude in Cu2X, suggesting their predominantly electronic nature. Our work not only clarifies the debate about the Cu2X gap but also provides a way to identify which of the different methods really captures the physical essence and which is the result of error cancellation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number244704
JournalJournal of Chemical Physics
Volume160
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jun 2024
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A way to identify whether a DFT gap is from right reasons or error cancellations: The case of copper chalcogenides'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this