TY - JOUR
T1 - A revisited by-production technology for energy-carbon emission nexus in the OECD countries
T2 - Measuring the green productivity gains under alternative input specifications
AU - Shen, Zhiyang
AU - Bai, Ge
AU - Baležentis, Tomas
AU - Zhang, Bin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The by-production (BP) model proposed by Murty et al. (2012) distinguishes between inputs that induce generation of the undesirable outputs (such inputs can include energy consumption) and those that do not contribute to generation of undesirable outputs (such inputs can include capital or labor). The BP model uses economic and environmental frontiers to approximate the production process and is considered to respect the materials balance principle. As the inputs contributing to generation of the undesirable outputs exhibit different roles (inequalities) across the two sub-technologies, construction of the input distance functions for construction of the productivity measures becomes cumbersome. To address this issue, the paper proposes a revision of the BP model where (i) the link between the two sub-technologies is improved and (ii) the role of the inputs that contribute to generation of the undesirable outputs is clarified. The revised model is fully compatible with popular productivity indices that incorporate input distance functions, such as the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen indicator, making it practically applicable for assessing green productivity change. The empirical example of the energy-economy-environment nexus in the OECD countries is considered. The non-parametric environmental production technologies and productivity measures are compared based on the empirical example. The findings reveal substantial differences among the various methods and suggest that the proposed approach may serve as a viable alternative to existing approaches.
AB - The by-production (BP) model proposed by Murty et al. (2012) distinguishes between inputs that induce generation of the undesirable outputs (such inputs can include energy consumption) and those that do not contribute to generation of undesirable outputs (such inputs can include capital or labor). The BP model uses economic and environmental frontiers to approximate the production process and is considered to respect the materials balance principle. As the inputs contributing to generation of the undesirable outputs exhibit different roles (inequalities) across the two sub-technologies, construction of the input distance functions for construction of the productivity measures becomes cumbersome. To address this issue, the paper proposes a revision of the BP model where (i) the link between the two sub-technologies is improved and (ii) the role of the inputs that contribute to generation of the undesirable outputs is clarified. The revised model is fully compatible with popular productivity indices that incorporate input distance functions, such as the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen indicator, making it practically applicable for assessing green productivity change. The empirical example of the energy-economy-environment nexus in the OECD countries is considered. The non-parametric environmental production technologies and productivity measures are compared based on the empirical example. The findings reveal substantial differences among the various methods and suggest that the proposed approach may serve as a viable alternative to existing approaches.
KW - By-production technology
KW - Data envelopment analysis
KW - Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen indicator
KW - Nonparametric estimation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026150523
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109900
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109900
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105026150523
SN - 0925-5273
JO - International Journal of Production Economics
JF - International Journal of Production Economics
M1 - 109900
ER -