高 校 公 共 实 验 平 台 共 享 管 理 与 运 行 机 制 研 究

Public experimental platforms in universities serve as crucial hubs supporting high-level scientific research, cultivation of innovative talents, and tackling of major research tasks. Compared with general teaching experimental platforms, cutting-edge public platforms are characterized by high-value equipment, stringent requirements for testing accuracy and environmental control, and significant operational risks. Their shared management is more susceptible to constraints such as equipment ownership, project task guarantee, operational cost sharing, and liability risk definition. Based on a comprehensive review of research related to the construction and operational management of university public experimental platforms, this paper focuses on the management challenges arising from integrating large-scale instruments and equipment purchased with national research project funds into public platforms. It analyzes the practical contradictions currently existing in the platforms regarding resource openness, fee settlement, and institutional support. The paper constructs an operational mechanism featuring "classified management, project prioritization, platform coordination, paid sharing, revenue feedback, and closed-loop liability”, and further establishes an institutional framework covering access classification, reservation-based openness, cost accounting, revenue distribution, risk control, and performance evaluation. The study concludes that universities should not adopt a simplistic administrative takeover model to promote the platform-based sharing of equipment purchased through research projects. Instead, they should achieve a gradual transition from closed ownership by research groups to orderly platform-based sharing through institutional arrangements, thereby improving the utilization efficiency and public service capacity of high-value scientific research equipment.